B2 Grammar Past

Used to, Would & Be Used To

Three structures that look alike but mean different things: used to for past habits and states, would for repeated past actions, and be used to for familiarity. This guide untangles them with clear rules and examples.

Few areas of English cause as much confusion as used to, would and be used to. They share words but belong to completely different grammar patterns. I used to smoke describes a past habit; We would go camping every summer describes a repeated past action; I'm used to the cold describes being familiar with something. This B2 guide makes the distinctions clear.

The single most important thing to grasp is the difference between two structures that look almost identical: used to + infinitive (a past habit) and be used to + -ing/noun (familiarity). They are not the same, and mixing them up is one of the most common advanced errors.

Used to + Infinitive

The structure used to + base verb describes a past habit or state that is no longer true. It tells us something was repeated or permanent in the past but has now stopped or changed.

Structure: subject + used to + base form of verb

Used to works for both actions (things you did) and states (things that were true), such as used to like, used to know, used to believe.

Negatives and questions

In negatives and questions, used to behaves like a past-simple verb with did, and it becomes use to (no d):

Form Example
AffirmativeI used to smoke.
NegativeI didn't use to smoke.
QuestionDid you use to smoke?
Negative (formal alt.)I used not to smoke. / I never used to smoke.

Spelling trap: After did/didn't, drop the final d: Did you use to live here? (not did you used to). The pronunciation is the same, so the mistake is easy to make in writing.

Would for Repeated Past Actions

Would can also describe repeated actions in the past, often in storytelling or nostalgic descriptions. It means roughly the same as used to for actions, but with one crucial limitation.

The crucial rule: would cannot be used for past states, only for repeated actions. You can say I used to live in Paris but not I would live in Paris. With state verbs like be, have, live, know, like, you must use used to.

Meaning used to would
Repeated past actions We used to go camping. We would go camping.
Past states (be, have, live, know) She used to be a nurse. She would be a nurse. (wrong)
Needs a time reference? No, works alone Usually needs context (every day, on Sundays)

Why it matters: Would for past habits usually needs a time expression or a clear past context to be understood, because would has other meanings (conditionals, polite requests). Used to is unambiguous and can open a sentence on its own.

Be Used To + -ing/Noun

This is the structure most often confused with the others. be used to + noun / -ing means “be familiar with” or “be accustomed to” something. Here used is an adjective meaning accustomed, and to is a preposition — so it is followed by a noun or the -ing form, never a base verb.

Structure: subject + be + used to + noun / -ing

Because it uses the verb be, this structure works in any tense: I was used to it (past), I am used to it (present), I will be used to it (future).

Get Used To + -ing/Noun

The closely related get used to + noun / -ing describes the process of becoming familiar with something. While be used to is a state (already familiar), get used to is the change toward that state.

Structure Meaning Example
be used to already familiar (a state) I am used to the heat.
get used to becoming familiar (a process) I am getting used to the heat.
used to (+ infinitive) past habit, now finished I used to find the heat unbearable.

The Key Contrast: Infinitive vs -ing

The cleanest way to keep these apart is to ask: is there a form of “be” or “get” before “used to”?

Compare these two sentences carefully:

Common Confusions

Practice Exercises

Talk About the Past with Confidence

LexFizz has 30 free interactive exercises — no sign-up needed. Start practising past habits today.

Browse All Exercises →

Explore related grammar topics:

All Grammar Topics Modal Verbs Conditionals Reported Speech Passive Voice

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ‘used to’ mean?
Used to + infinitive describes a past habit or state that is no longer true: I used to play tennis (but I don't now); She used to live in Paris (a past state). It works for both repeated actions and permanent states, and it always refers to the past, telling us that something has since stopped or changed.
What is the difference between ‘used to’ and ‘would’?
Both can describe repeated past actions: We used to / would go camping every summer. The key difference is that would cannot describe past states. You can say I used to have a car or She used to be shy, but not I would have a car or She would be shy. With state verbs (be, have, live, know, like), only used to is correct. Would also usually needs a time reference.
What is the difference between ‘used to’ and ‘be used to’?
They are completely different structures. Used to + infinitive describes a finished past habit: I used to drive to work (in the past). Be used to + -ing/noun means “be familiar with”: I am used to driving to work (it's normal for me). The test: if there is a form of be before used to, it means familiarity and takes -ing; if not, it is a past habit and takes the infinitive.
Why is it ‘be used to driving’ and not ‘be used to drive’?
In be used to, the word to is a preposition, not part of an infinitive. Prepositions are followed by a noun or the -ing form, never a base verb. So we say I'm used to driving or I'm used to the noise, just as we say I'm interested in cooking. Writing be used to drive is a very common error.
How do I form negatives and questions with ‘used to’?
Treat it like a past-simple verb with did, and drop the final d: I didn't use to smoke; Did you use to live here? Note the spelling — it becomes use to (no d) after did/didn't. More formal alternatives are I used not to… and I never used to…
What is the difference between ‘be used to’ and ‘get used to’?
Be used to describes a state — you are already familiar with something: I am used to the heat. Get used to describes the process of becoming familiar: I am getting used to the heat; It took time to get used to the new job. Both are followed by a noun or the -ing form.
Can I use ‘would’ for past states like ‘would be’ or ‘would have’?
No. Would for past habits only works with action verbs, not state verbs. She used to be a teacher is correct, but She would be a teacher is wrong (it sounds like a conditional). The same applies to have, live, know, like, believe and own. For past states, always choose used to.
Does ‘used to’ have a present-tense version?
No. Used to + infinitive exists only in the past. To talk about present habits, use the present simple, often with an adverb of frequency: I usually play tennis on Saturdays, not I use to play. However, be used to (familiarity) does work in the present: I am used to it. Be careful not to confuse the two.
When should I use ‘would’ instead of ‘used to’?
Use would for vivid, repeated past actions in storytelling or nostalgic descriptions, especially when you have already set the past scene: Every summer we would drive to the coast, and my father would sing the whole way. It adds a narrative, reminiscing tone. For a single neutral statement of a past habit or any past state, used to is safer and clearer.
What are common mistakes with ‘used to’ and ‘be used to’?
The most frequent errors are: (1) using -ing after the past-habit used to — wrong: I used to working; right: I used to work. (2) Forgetting be in the familiarity structure — wrong: I used to the noise; right: I am used to the noise. (3) Keeping the d after did — wrong: Did you used to; right: Did you use to. (4) Using a base verb after be used to — wrong: I'm used to get up early; right: I'm used to getting up early.