The English infinitive is the base verb introduced by to: to go, to understand, to decide. A split infinitive happens when a word, most often an adverb, is inserted between to and the verb, as in to really understand or the famous to boldly go where no one has gone before. For over a century, some teachers insisted this was an error, but modern grammarians and every major style guide agree the split infinitive is correct English.
The old taboo came from nineteenth-century writers who tried to make English behave like Latin, where the infinitive is a single word that cannot be split. English infinitives are two words, so there is nothing to break. The real question is not "is it allowed?" but "where does the adverb read most clearly?"
Where the Adverb Can Go
An adverb modifying an infinitive can usually sit in three positions. Each can be correct, but they differ in clarity and emphasis.
| Position | Example | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Split (between to and verb) | I want to really learn it. | Often clearest; emphasises the adverb |
| Before to | I really want to learn it. | Changes which verb the adverb modifies |
| After the verb | I want to learn it really. | Can sound awkward or ambiguous |
When Splitting Improves Clarity
Sometimes refusing to split creates ambiguity or unnatural rhythm. The split is the best option when moving the adverb would change the meaning or attach it to the wrong word.
- Avoiding ambiguity: She decided to gradually reduce her hours is clear; She decided gradually to reduce her hours could mean the deciding was gradual.
- Keeping emphasis: We expect to more than double sales cannot be unsplit without sounding odd.
- Strong adverbs: intensifiers like really, truly, completely often read best right before the verb.
The clarity test: try the sentence with the adverb in each position. Choose the one that is unambiguous and reads smoothly. If only the split version is clear, split it without hesitation — clarity always beats an outdated rule.
When to Avoid Splitting
In very formal writing, or where a long phrase would awkwardly separate to from its verb, it is better to move the adverb.
- Long interruptions: avoid to quickly and without warning leave; place the phrase elsewhere.
- Conservative readers: in formal or legal documents some readers still dislike splits, so a clean alternative can be safer.
- No loss of clarity: if moving the adverb keeps the meaning, the unsplit version may flow better.
Splitting With Negatives and Multiple Words
You can split with not and short phrases, but keep the insertion brief:
- He promised to never lie again. (clear, common)
- We aim to fully and fairly assess each case. (two adverbs, still readable)
- Avoid a long string: to, after much thought, decide is clumsy.
Common Mistakes
- Believing splits are wrong: they are not; this is a debunked myth.
- Awkward unsplitting: forcing the adverb out can create ambiguity, as in gradually to reduce.
- Overlong splits: separating to from the verb with a long phrase hurts readability.
- Misplaced emphasis: moving the adverb can attach it to the wrong verb and change meaning.
Practice Exercises
Grammar Quiz
Decide which adverb position reads most clearly.
Cloze Dropdown
Choose where to place the adverb in each sentence.
Complete the Sentence
Add an adverb to an infinitive without losing clarity.
Matching Pairs
Match sentences with their clearest adverb position.
Unjumble
Reorder words into a clear infinitive phrase.
Flash Cards
Drill split vs unsplit infinitive examples.
Master Advanced English Style
LexFizz has 30 free interactive exercises — no sign-up needed. Start practising infinitives today.
Browse All Exercises →Explore related grammar topics: